So You Want A Revolution on Shea Butter & Incense Economics?

Hang out on social media long enough and no doubt you'll encounter some of the more radical elements of our culture.  Historically, there has ALWAYS been a radical element in Black culture from the moment the slaves were freed, and it has grown and shrunk as the times have changed.    Social media it seems has given it a new life as a new generation is coming to terms with their view and expression of Blackness.  

Is this embracing of new militant Blackness wrong?  No, I don't think so.  In fact I enjoy the right and ability of young (or old) people of color being able to choose the way they express their Blackness and structure a life based on it.  BUT, and this is a very big but, I think that ANY belief system, ideology or perspective you adopt has to be grounded in truth AND reality (sorry my church-folk brothers and sisters it seems like you missed the mark on this one).

One of the more pressing questions NOT being asked of this new militant generation is "Who's going to fund your revolution?"  Who's going to buy your bullets and guns?  Who will feed, cloth and house your soldiers?  Or their families?  And for how long?  This is summed up in a great quote I once read that I don't know who originally wrote or said:

"Amateurs study tactics.  Smart amateurs study strategy.  Professionals study logistics."

The reality of living in America is that ANY change needs logistics in the form of capital, resources, manpower and commitment, and often very large amounts of all of it.  Unless you are bringing your own dollars to the cause that capital has to come from somewhere, or someone else and you'll be beholden to whomever that (or those) person(s) or organization(s) is to include THEIR agenda in YOUR revolution.  

Maybe your goals will align, maybe not, but if these entities/organizations/people are funding your movement you better believe they WILL ensure their goals/aims/objectives are met, usually first.

Many people will point out the underground economy (i.e. "street hustling") as a way to fund a revolution.  This is what I call "shea butter & incense economics" since these brothers and sisters are hustling on an individual, not group level.  

Even if they band together as a group their economic power won't be enough in aggregate to support the logistics of a revolution.  No slight to the hustlers, but they won't have the time or resources to really build the wealth needed for revolution, let alone social change. No, if you need capital then you will need CAPITALISTS.  And this is where things get interesting.  

Courting capitalists means your revolution HAS to include their agenda.  So while you're "calling out" folks as coons and sellouts maybe take a moment to step back and think for a minute.  Wouldn't it be better to have a few of those folks on your side funding that revolution rather than funding against it?  

Trust and believe, call someone a coon and sellout long enough and they WILL work for the other side at worst, or be a persistent and well funded roadblock at best.  Only fools make enemies before they are strong enough to defeat them.

On The Matrix, and Being Limitless

On The Matrix, and Being Limitless

One of the more popular references you hear in the "Black sector" of cyberspace is to the movie "The Matrix". To many the movie was mish-mosh of varying concepts, ideologies, philosophies and religious references.  To others it mirrored truth.  In pocket of cyberspace though, the Matrix is one of the most popular analogies for white supremacy and the various systems that support, manage and uphold it.   Like all art though, it's open to YOUR personal interpretation.  Good art is supposed to make you think and there's no doubt the Matrix trilogy is good art because if nothing else the movies made people think!

While I will say the analogy of the Matrix representing the struggle against white supremacy has merit, the way it's most often interpreted some critical concepts of the comparison are either ignored, forgotten, or plan skipped over to support whatever the person using it is saying, or point they are attempting to make.

In the effort to shed light on where I'm going with this allow me to break it down as I interpret the trilogy:

1. Any system can be beaten.
There it is, the main theme of all the movies.  In the films they (meaning the characters) acknowledge in various conversations that there is no such thing as the perfect system.  In fact in the first and second films they make it clear that they achieved as close to a "perfect" Matrix as they could get, and it was a failure (both Mr. Smith and the Architect specifically mention this).

No system created, no matter how powerful, large, intricate, secure or well intended is perfect.   As humans, we are are not designed to create or for that matter accept perfection, our minds will reject that 'reality' every time.

The Architect, in the second Matrix film alludes to this in his rather long and overly wordy speech:

Systems just are not capable of accounting for every choice (or choices) made by humans and because of this "anomalies" occur within the system that will eventually "crash" it, either from the random chaos introduced by the anomaly of choice, or the effort of the system to account for/control that choice.

2. Since these systems are created by (or for) humans, the 'Rules" can be broken, bent, altered and subverted IF you understand them.
Going back to the first film, the fight scene between Neo and Morpheus is critical. NOT because of the action (but yea, the fighting was way cool!), but because of the conversation.  Morpheus is trying to demonstrate how "rules" work in the Matrix world, the fighting was just a visual display of that conversation (between Neo and Morpheus) and of the rules.  Through the goading of Morpheus at certain points Neo stops "thinking" and just reacts, and its at these points he is able to bend and alter the rules of the Matrix, even if he's not aware he's doing it (at least at this point he's not aware).

3. Free will and choice will ALWAYS introduce unaccountable anomalies to any system, (but you have to understand that system to purposefully exploit these anomalies)
The most successful large, complex systems are designed to account for a degree of "predictive" behavior, meaning they are designed to expect typical actions a user would take along a logic path.  Most of the decisions we make and think are free will but have actually been anticipated and accounted for by the controlling system.

As humans though, we don't always follow the predictable path or make anticipated choices, if we chose at all.  This is when the system tends to either ignore those unexpected actions, break down or go haywire.  This is one of the methods of hacking by the way, feeding a system unanticipated data in the hopes that it will either break or choke trying to make sense of the input. 

This is illustrated in the "jump program" scene in the first "Matrix" movie.  Here Morpheus demonstrates how an understanding of the system allows you to choose which rules can be broken (or in this, case bent). In this scene it's altering how gravity and physics work.

4. Once you know and understand a systems rules, you're limitless
As a boy, my father taught me that I was limitless.  My mind has the ability to absorb, process and utilize as much knowledge as I am able to feed into it.  My only true limits are: Time (I can only learn so much at a given time), Space (meaning physical access to new knowledge) and the Body (gotta sleep, eat, use the bathroom, work, etc.).  Aside from those constraints the only true limit is my desire.  If you can activate your desire for knowledge then you truly become limitless because you can process knowledge on  continual basis.


5. Some rules, however, cannot be broken or bent
Even in the Matrix movies there are some rules the characters could not get around.  The two most powerful characters in the movies (Agent Smith and Neo) were still bound by certain realities they could not get around, no matter how hard they tried.  These same rules apply to us in this real world:

Time: In the Matrix movies as in life, time was always moving forward.  It could be slowed, but not stopped or rewound.  Time travel in the movies, as in our world, doesn't exist.  Characters had to sleep, days had cycles and people both inside and outside the Matrix observed daily routines (shopping, work, etc.).  In the end, the systems of control were as depenedent on time as the subjects themselves.

Geography: The characters were limited by distance, space and location.

Love and emotion: Love was the chaos factor that superseded any programming.

Death:  Both Agent Smith and Neo were the only two characters that seemed to be able to manipulate death.  In the real world however no one has displayed that ability (though some would claim Jesus was able to do this).

In Conclusion
I'm going to publish this for you, the readers, view and commentary, and then think about it a bit more and revisit these words at a later date.  I'm curious to know what you think.

Joe